[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 20:03:28 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
Cc: agross@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
paul.bouchara@...ainline.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-xperia: Add support for
wcn3990 Bluetooth
Il 09/09/21 15:19, Dmitry Baryshkov ha scritto:
> On 03/09/2021 21:09, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> This platform uses the WCN3990 Bluetooth chip, reachable on UART-3.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
>> ---
>> .../dts/qcom/msm8998-sony-xperia-yoshino.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-sony-xperia-yoshino.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-sony-xperia-yoshino.dtsi
>> index 2fe53e4675d5..66b009ba72fe 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-sony-xperia-yoshino.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-sony-xperia-yoshino.dtsi
>> @@ -179,6 +179,23 @@ &blsp1_i2c5_sleep {
>> bias-disable;
>> };
>> +&blsp1_uart3 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + bluetooth {
>> + compatible = "qcom,wcn3990-bt";
>> +
>> + vddio-supply = <&vreg_s4a_1p8>;
>> + vddxo-supply = <&vreg_l7a_1p8>;
>> + vddrf-supply = <&vreg_l17a_1p3>;
>> + vddch0-supply = <&vreg_l25a_3p3>;
>> + max-speed = <3200000>;
>> +
>> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2_PIN>;
>> + };
>> +};
>
> There is an ongoing proposal to rework wcn3990 (bt and wifi) bindings, so we might
> want to delay this a bit. Not a strict requirement, since the changes would be
> backwards-compatible.
>
>
Delaying this patch is not a problem on my side - but if the changes are backwards
compatible, do we really have reasons to delay it?
In any case, I trust your judgement on this: if you want to delay it, I will send
the wcn3990 support after the rework.
Cheers,
- Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists