lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 Sep 2021 17:32:20 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Wu Zongyong <wuzongyong@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        wei.yang1@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] vdpa: add get_vq_num_unchangeable callback in vdpa_config_ops

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 5:18 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 10:55:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 8:23 PM Wu Zongyong <wuzongyong@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This new callback is used to indicate whether the vring size can be
> > > change or not. It is useful when we have a legacy virtio pci device as
> > > the vdpa device for there is no way to negotiate the vring num by the
> > > specification.
> >
> > So I'm not sure it's worth bothering. E.g what if we just fail
> > VHOST_SET_VRING_NUM it the value doesn't match what hardware has?
> >
> > Thanks
>
> More importantly is there and actual plan for supporting
> legacy devices? I don't think they currently work at a number
> of levels.

I think the answer is no, it would introduce a lot of burdens.

Thanks

>
> --
> MST
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ