[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 13:07:43 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: wujinhua <wujinhua@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: x86 <x86@...nel.org>, "zelin.deng" <zelin.deng@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"jiayu.ni" <jiayu.ni@...ux.alibaba.com>, ak <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"luming.yu" <luming.yu@...el.com>, "fan.du" <fan.du@...el.com>,
"artie.ding" <artie.ding@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"tony.luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>, tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"pawan.kumar.gupta" <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
"fenghua.yu" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, hpa <hpa@...or.com>,
"ricardo.neri-calderon" <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
peterz <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: 回复:[PATCH] perf: optimize clear page in Intel specified model with movq instruction
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 07:02:08PM +0800, wujinhua wrote:
> I provide three tests and result for you. All the tests run in Intel
> CPX.
I said
"What you should do is show the extensive tests you've run with
real-world benchmarks..."
Are your tests real-world benchmarks?
IOW, no microbenchmarks please.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists