lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:08:45 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     matthias.bgg@...il.com, Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>,
        tiwai@...e.com
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: mediatek: common: handle NULL case in suspend/resume function

On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:26:13 +0800, Trevor Wu wrote:
> When memory allocation for afe->reg_back_up fails, reg_back_up can't
> be used.
> Keep the suspend/resume flow but skip register backup when
> afe->reg_back_up is NULL, in case illegal memory access happens.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: common: handle NULL case in suspend/resume function
      commit: 1dd038522615b70f5f8945c5631e9e2fa5bd58b1

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ