[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a31836c3-6999-339b-32f8-5f7d7f7e5b27@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 22:19:03 +0530
From: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: saurav.girepunje@...mail.com, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
florian.c.schilhabel@...glemail.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
fmdefrancesco@...il.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8712: Move similar execution in to a
function.
On 10/09/21 2:30 pm, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 01:59:19PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
>> In rtl8712_cmd.c function read_macreg_hdl,write_macreg_hdl,write_bbreg_hdl
>> and write_rfreg_hdl all are having same execution.
>
> I get what you're trying to do, because this code is bad and duplicative
> but this is not the right fix.
>
> Let's take read_macreg_hdl() as an example.
>
> Look at how it's called:
>
> 215 switch (pcmd->cmdcode) {
> 216 case GEN_CMD_CODE(_Read_MACREG):
> 217 read_macreg_hdl(padapter, (u8 *)pcmd);
> 218 pcmd_r = pcmd;
> 219 break;
>
> Then look at how it's implemented:
>
> 120 static u8 read_macreg_hdl(struct _adapter *padapter, u8 *pbuf)
> 121 {
> 122 void (*pcmd_callback)(struct _adapter *dev, struct cmd_obj *pcmd);
> 123 struct cmd_obj *pcmd = (struct cmd_obj *)pbuf;
> 124
> 125 /* invoke cmd->callback function */
> 126 pcmd_callback = cmd_callback[pcmd->cmdcode].callback;
>
> So pcmd->cmdcode is GEN_CMD_CODE(_Read_MACREG). We look that up in the
> cmd_callback[] array and it is:
>
> {GEN_CMD_CODE(_Read_MACREG), NULL}, /*0*/
>
> 127 if (!pcmd_callback)
> 128 r8712_free_cmd_obj(pcmd);
>
> So now we no that "pcmd_callback" is NULL meaning it will free "pcmd".
> And if you remember in the caller it does "pcmd_r = pcmd;" but "pcmd"
> is freed so that's going to lead to a use after free in r8712_cmd_thread().
> It's garbage and the patch doesn't really help.
One more thought here after the
127 if (!pcmd_callback)
128 r8712_free_cmd_obj(pcmd);
r8712_free_cmd_obj(pcmd); we could do pcmd = NULL; so in the caller
when it will do "pcmd_r = pcmd;" it is actually making NULL to pcmd_r.
On r8712_cmd_thread there is check for pcmd is NULL or not before
execution on pcmd.
pcmd = cmd_hdl_filter(padapter, pcmd);
if (pcmd) { /* if pcmd != NULL, cmd will be handled by f/w */
Please let me know you thought on this dan.
>
> The right way to fix it is to get rid of the cmd_callback[] array.
>
> 129 else
> 130 pcmd_callback(padapter, pcmd);
> 131 return H2C_SUCCESS;
> 132 }
>
> Getting rid of the cmd_callback[] array looks like this. In
> read_rfreg_hdl() we know that the callback is r8712_getbbrfreg_cmdrsp_callback()
> so we can call that directly.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_cmd.c
> index e9294e1ed06e..51a6abb27d41 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_cmd.c
> @@ -174,11 +174,7 @@ static u8 read_rfreg_hdl(struct _adapter *padapter, u8 *pbuf)
>
> if (pcmd->rsp && pcmd->rspsz > 0)
> memcpy(pcmd->rsp, (u8 *)&val, pcmd->rspsz);
> - pcmd_callback = cmd_callback[pcmd->cmdcode].callback;
> - if (!pcmd_callback)
> - r8712_free_cmd_obj(pcmd);
> - else
> - pcmd_callback(padapter, pcmd);
> + r8712_getbbrfreg_cmdrsp_callback(padapter, pcmd);
> return H2C_SUCCESS;
> }
>
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Thanks Dan for review.
Regards,
Saurav Girepunje
Powered by blists - more mailing lists