linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 31/31] staging: wfx: indent functions arguments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Sep 2021 20:28:29 +0300
From:   Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@...il.com>
To:     Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/31] staging: wfx: indent functions arguments

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:12:28PM +0200, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> On Friday 10 September 2021 18:57:43 CEST Kari Argillander wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 06:05:04PM +0200, Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> > > From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
> > >
> > > Function arguments must be aligned with left parenthesis. Apply that
> > > rule.
> > 
> > To my eyes something still go wrong with this patch. Might be my email
> > fault, but every other patch looks ok. Now these are too left.
> 
> I don't try anymore to check alignments with my email viewer. The
> original patch is as I expect (and I take care to send my patch with
> base64 to avoid pitfalls with MS Exchange). So, I think the is correct.

It was correct. Nice to now know about that something funny is happening
with my part.

> 
> > Also it should alight with first argument not left parenthesis?
> 
> Absolutely.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jérôme Pouiller
> 
>