linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] iov

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:10:16 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] iov_iter fixes

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:04 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> So only 'struct iovec' and 'struct kvec' actually have the same format
> and can be used interchangeably.

That was very badly and confusingly phrased. They obviously don't
actually have the same format, and cannot be used interchangeably in
general.

But the pointer arithmetic works the same for those two union members,
so for that very specific case (and _only_ that) you can treat them as
equivalent and use them interchangeably.

Al clearly understood that, but I just wanted to clarify my phrasing
for anybody else reading this thread. Please don't use the iov/kvec
members interchangeably in general.

              Linus