[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb294b5d-82f2-be80-b3e3-db556c155d95@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 08:18:47 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/24] x86/entry: Introduce struct ist_regs
On 2021/9/1 01:50, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> struct ist_regs is the upmost stack frame for IST interrupt, it
> consists of struct pt_regs and other fields which will be added in
> later patch.
>
> Make vc_switch_off_ist() take ist_regs as its argument and it will switch
> the whole ist_regs if needed.
>
> Make the frame before calling paranoid_entry() and paranoid_exit() be
> struct ist_regs.
>
> This patch is prepared for converting paranoid_entry() and paranoid_exit()
> into C code which will need the additinal fields to store the results in
> paranoid_entry() and to use them in paranoid_exit().
This patch was over designed.
In ASM code, we can easily save results in the callee-saved registers.
For example, rc3 is saved in %r14, gsbase info is saved in %rbx.
And in C code, we can't save results in registers. And I thought there was
no place to save the results because the CR3 and gsbase are not kernel's.
So I extended the pt_regs to ist_regs to save the results.
But it was incorrect. The results can be saved in percpu data at the end of
paranoid_entry() after the CR3/gsbase are settled down. And the results
can be read at the beginning of paranoid_exit() before the CR3/gsbase are
switched to the interrupted context's.
sigh.
>
> The C interrupt handlers don't use struct ist_regs due to they don't need
> the additional fields in the struct ist_regs, and they still use pt_regs.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists