[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ea07b83-f592-749e-80c3-27ed144171bc@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:23:26 -0700
From: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
CC: <mdf@...nel.org>, <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <trix@...hat.com>,
<lgoncalv@...hat.com>, <hao.wu@...el.com>,
<matthew.gerlach@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 4/6] fpga: image-load: add status ioctl
On 9/10/21 1:50 AM, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 07:18:44PM -0700, Russ Weight wrote:
>> Extend the FPGA Image Load class driver to include an
>> FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS IOCTL that can be used to monitor the progress
>> of an ongoing image load. The status returned includes how much data
>> remains to be transferred, the progress of the image load, and error
>> information in the case of a failure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>
>> ---
>> V15:
>> - This patch is new to the patchset and provides an FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS
>> IOCTL to return the current values for: remaining_size, progress,
>> err_progress, and err_code.
>> - This patch has elements of the following three patches from the previous
>> patch-set:
>> [PATCH v14 3/6] fpga: sec-mgr: expose sec-mgr update status
>> [PATCH v14 4/6] fpga: sec-mgr: expose sec-mgr update errors
>> [PATCH v14 5/6] fpga: sec-mgr: expose sec-mgr update size
>> - Changed file, symbol, and config names to reflect the new driver name
>> - There are some minor changes to locking to enable this ioctl to return
>> coherent data.
>> ---
>> Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst | 6 +++
>> drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h | 18 +++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst b/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst
>> index 739d735592a5..3d5eb51223e3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/fpga/fpga-image-load.rst
>> @@ -31,3 +31,9 @@ updated. This is an exclusive operation; an attempt to start concurrent image
>> load for the same device will fail with EBUSY. An eventfd file descriptor
>> parameter is provided to this IOCTL, and it will be signalled at the
>> completion of the image load.
>> +
>> +FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS:
>> +
>> +Collect status for an on-going image upload. The status returned includes
>> +how much data remains to be transferred, the progress of the image load,
>> +and error information in the case of a failure.
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c
>> index b784456765b0..99a47b21c995 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-image-load.c
>> @@ -22,10 +22,27 @@ static dev_t fpga_image_devt;
>>
>> #define to_image_load(d) container_of(d, struct fpga_image_load, dev)
>>
>> -static void fpga_image_dev_error(struct fpga_image_load *imgld,
>> +static void fpga_image_update_progress(struct fpga_image_load *imgld,
>> + enum fpga_image_prog new_progress)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&imgld->lock);
>> + imgld->progress = new_progress;
>> + mutex_unlock(&imgld->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void fpga_image_set_error(struct fpga_image_load *imgld,
>> enum fpga_image_err err_code)
>> {
>> + mutex_lock(&imgld->lock);
>> + imgld->err_progress = imgld->progress;
>> imgld->err_code = err_code;
>> + mutex_unlock(&imgld->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void fpga_image_dev_error(struct fpga_image_load *imgld,
>> + enum fpga_image_err err_code)
>> +{
>> + fpga_image_set_error(imgld, err_code);
>> imgld->lops->cancel(imgld);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -49,18 +66,18 @@ static void fpga_image_do_load(struct work_struct *work)
>>
>> get_device(&imgld->dev);
>> if (!try_module_get(imgld->dev.parent->driver->owner)) {
>> - imgld->err_code = FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_BUSY;
>> + fpga_image_set_error(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_BUSY);
>> goto idle_exit;
>> }
>>
>> - imgld->progress = FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PREPARING;
>> + fpga_image_update_progress(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PREPARING);
>> ret = imgld->lops->prepare(imgld);
>> if (ret != FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_NONE) {
>> fpga_image_dev_error(imgld, ret);
>> goto modput_exit;
>> }
>>
>> - imgld->progress = FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_WRITING;
>> + fpga_image_update_progress(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_WRITING);
>> while (imgld->remaining_size) {
>> ret = imgld->lops->write_blk(imgld, offset);
>> if (ret != FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_NONE) {
>> @@ -71,7 +88,7 @@ static void fpga_image_do_load(struct work_struct *work)
>> offset = size - imgld->remaining_size;
>> }
>>
>> - imgld->progress = FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PROGRAMMING;
>> + fpga_image_update_progress(imgld, FPGA_IMAGE_PROG_PROGRAMMING);
>> ret = imgld->lops->poll_complete(imgld);
>> if (ret != FPGA_IMAGE_ERR_NONE)
>> fpga_image_dev_error(imgld, ret);
>> @@ -151,20 +168,42 @@ static int fpga_image_load_ioctl_write(struct fpga_image_load *imgld,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int fpga_image_load_ioctl_status(struct fpga_image_load *imgld,
>> + unsigned long arg)
>> +{
>> + struct fpga_image_status status;
>> +
>> + memset(&status, 0, sizeof(status));
>> + status.progress = imgld->progress;
>> + status.remaining_size = imgld->remaining_size;
>> + status.err_progress = imgld->err_progress;
>> + status.err_code = imgld->err_code;
>> +
>> + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &status, sizeof(status)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static long fpga_image_load_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
>> unsigned long arg)
>> {
>> struct fpga_image_load *imgld = filp->private_data;
>> int ret = -ENOTTY;
>>
>> + mutex_lock(&imgld->lock);
>> +
>> switch (cmd) {
>> case FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_WRITE:
>> - mutex_lock(&imgld->lock);
>> ret = fpga_image_load_ioctl_write(imgld, arg);
>> - mutex_unlock(&imgld->lock);
>> + break;
>> + case FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS:
>> + ret = fpga_image_load_ioctl_status(imgld, arg);
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> + mutex_unlock(&imgld->lock);
>> +
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h b/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h
>> index a60da115adf5..6a995bcc0fb7 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fpga-image-load.h
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ enum fpga_image_err {
>> };
>>
>> #define FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_WRITE _IOW(FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_MAGIC, 0, struct fpga_image_write)
>> +#define FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS _IOR(FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_MAGIC, 1, struct fpga_image_status)
>>
>> /**
>> * FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_WRITE - _IOW(FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_MAGIC, 0,
>> @@ -56,4 +57,21 @@ struct fpga_image_write {
>> __u64 buf; /* User space address of source data */
>> };
>>
>> +/**
>> + * FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_STATUS - _IOR(FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_MAGIC, 1,
>> + * struct fpga_image_status)
>> + *
>> + * Request status information for an ongoing update.
>> + * data buffer, size, and an eventfd file descriptor.
> This line is a typo.
Thanks - I'll fix it.
>
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
>> + */
>> +struct fpga_image_status {
>> + /* Output */
>> + __u32 remaining_size; /* size remaining to transfer */
>> + enum fpga_image_prog progress; /* current progress of image load */
>> + enum fpga_image_prog err_progress; /* progress at time of error */
>> + enum fpga_image_err err_code; /* error code */
> Should we use __u32 for these enumeration types?
We could, but I did see a lot of uapi header file examples that use
enum for IOCTL structures. Is there a reason to prefer __u32? If I change
these to __u32, then I suppose I need to change from enum declarations to
#define macros?
- Russ
>
> Thanks,
> Yilun
>
>> +};
>> +
>> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_FPGA_IMAGE_LOAD_H */
>> --
>> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists