linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 21/53] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix race condition during iommu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210910002028.175174-21-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu,  9 Sep 2021 20:19:56 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
        Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 21/53] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix race condition during iommu_group creation

From: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@...dia.com>

[ Upstream commit b1a1347912a742a4e1fcdc9df6302dd9dd2c3405 ]

When two devices with same SID are getting probed concurrently through
iommu_probe_device(), the iommu_group sometimes is getting allocated more
than once as call to arm_smmu_device_group() is not protected for
concurrency. Furthermore, it leads to each device holding a different
iommu_group and domain pointer, separate IOVA space and only one of the
devices' domain is used for translations from IOMMU. This causes accesses
from other device to fault or see incorrect translations.
Fix this by protecting iommu_group allocation from concurrency in
arm_smmu_device_group().

Signed-off-by: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1628570641-9127-3-git-send-email-amhetre@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
index df24bbe3ea4f..7a0fea12d0e5 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -1475,6 +1475,7 @@ static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
 	struct iommu_group *group = NULL;
 	int i, idx;
 
+	mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
 	for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
 		if (group && smmu->s2crs[idx].group &&
 		    group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group)
@@ -1483,8 +1484,10 @@ static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
 		group = smmu->s2crs[idx].group;
 	}
 
-	if (group)
+	if (group) {
+		mutex_unlock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
 		return iommu_group_ref_get(group);
+	}
 
 	if (dev_is_pci(dev))
 		group = pci_device_group(dev);
@@ -1498,6 +1501,7 @@ static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
 		for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx)
 			smmu->s2crs[idx].group = group;
 
+	mutex_unlock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
 	return group;
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2