[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210910015351.yxvgv2nedgojmmeo@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:53:51 +0800
From: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong93@...ux.alibaba.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kvm: x86: Introduce hypercall x86 ops for
handling hypercall not in cpl0
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 05:09:11PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021, Yu Zhang wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 07:55:23PM +0800, Hou Wenlong wrote:
> > > Per Intel's SDM, use vmcall instruction in non VMX operation for cpl3
> > > it should trigger a #UD. And in VMX root operation, it should
> >
> > Are you sure? IIRC, vmcall will always cause VM exit as long as CPU
> > is in non-root mode(regardless the CPL).
>
> Correct, VMCALL unconditionally causes VM-Exit in non-root mode, but Hou is
> referring to the first fault condition of "non VMX operation". The intent of the
> patch is to emulate hardware behavior for CPL>0: if L1 is not in VMX operation,
> a.k.a. not post-VMXON, then #UD, else #GP (because VMCALL #GPs at CPL>0 in VMX
> root).
Oh, I see. It's to make the virtualized world more real. But like you said,
it's not KVM's target. And doing that could cause more problems - a PV guest
expects the VMCALL to succeed, regardless it has VMX capability or its VMX is
on or not.
Thanks for the explaination.
B.R.
Yu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists