linux-kernel - Re: [memcg] 45208c9105: aim7.jobs-per-min -14.0% regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Sep 2021 21:17:54 -0700
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        0day robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        "Michal Koutn??" <mkoutny@...e.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [memcg] 45208c9105: aim7.jobs-per-min -14.0% regression

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:34 PM Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 06:19:06PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> [...]
> > > > > > I am looking into this. I was hoping we have resolution for [1] as
> > > > > > these patches touch similar data structures.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210811031734.GA5193@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/T/#u
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried 2 debug methods for that 36.4% vm-scalability regression:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Disable the HW cache prefetcher, no effect on this case
> > > > > 2. relayout and add padding to 'struct cgroup_subsys_state', reduce
> > > > >    the regression to 3.1%
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Feng but it seems like the issue for this commit is different.
> > > > Rearranging the layout didn't help. Actually the cause of slowdown is
> > > > the call to queue_work() inside __mod_memcg_lruvec_state().
> > > >
> > > > At the moment, queue_work() is called after 32 updates. I changed it
> > > > to 128 and the slowdown of will-it-scale:page_fault[1|2|3] halved
> > > > (from around 10% to 5%). I am unable to run reaim or
> > > > will-it-scale:fallocate2 as I was getting weird errors.
> > > >
> > > > Feng, is it possible for you to run these benchmarks with the change
> > > > (basically changing MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH to 128 in the if condition
> > > > before queue_work() inside __mod_memcg_lruvec_state())?
> > >
> > > When I checked this, I tried different changes, including this batch
> > > number change :), but it didn't recover the regression (the regression
> > > is slightly reduced to about 12%)
> [...]
> >
> > Another change we can try is to remove this specific queue_work()
> > altogether because this is the only significant change for the
> > workload. That will give us the base performance number. If that also
> > has regression then there are more issues to debug. Thanks a lot for
> > your help.
>
> I just tested with patch removing the queue_work() in __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(),
> and the regression is gone.

Thanks again for confirming this. I will follow this lead and see how
to improve this.