linux-kernel - [PATCH] psi : calc cfs task memstall time more precisely

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Sep 2021 15:54:46 +0800
From:   Huangzhaoyang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xuewen.yan@...soc.com,
        ke.wang@...soc.com
Subject: [PATCH] psi : calc cfs task  memstall time more precisely

From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>

cfs task's memstall time is counted as simple as exit - entry so far, which
ignore the preempted time by rt, dl and irq time. Eliminating them by calc the
time growth via the proportion of cfs_rq's utilization on the whole rq.

eg.
Here is the scenario which this commit want to fix, that is the rt and irq consume
some utilization of the whole rq. This scenario could be typical in a core
which is assigned to deal with all irqs. Furthermore, the rt task used to run on
little core under EAS.

Binder:305_3-314    [002] d..1   257.880195: psi_memtime_fixup: original:30616,adjusted:25951,se:89,cfs:353,rt:139,dl:0,irq:18
droid.phone-1525    [001] d..1   265.145492: psi_memtime_fixup: original:61616,adjusted:53492,se:55,cfs:225,rt:121,dl:0,irq:15

Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
---
 kernel/sched/psi.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
index cc25a3c..754a836 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
@@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ struct psi_group psi_system = {
 
 static void psi_avgs_work(struct work_struct *work);
 
+static unsigned long psi_memtime_fixup(u32 growth);
+
 static void group_init(struct psi_group *group)
 {
 	int cpu;
@@ -492,6 +494,21 @@ static u64 window_update(struct psi_window *win, u64 now, u64 value)
 	return growth;
 }
 
+static unsigned long psi_memtime_fixup(u32 growth)
+{
+	struct rq *rq = task_rq(current);
+	unsigned long growth_fixed = (unsigned long)growth;
+
+	if (!(current->policy == SCHED_NORMAL || current->policy == SCHED_BATCH))
+		return growth_fixed;
+
+	if (current->in_memstall)
+		growth_fixed = div64_ul((1024 - rq->avg_rt.util_avg - rq->avg_dl.util_avg
+					- rq->avg_irq.util_avg + 1) * growth, 1024);
+
+	return growth_fixed;
+}
+
 static void init_triggers(struct psi_group *group, u64 now)
 {
 	struct psi_trigger *t;
@@ -658,6 +675,7 @@ static void record_times(struct psi_group_cpu *groupc, u64 now)
 	}
 
 	if (groupc->state_mask & (1 << PSI_MEM_SOME)) {
+		delta = psi_memtime_fixup(delta);
 		groupc->times[PSI_MEM_SOME] += delta;
 		if (groupc->state_mask & (1 << PSI_MEM_FULL))
 			groupc->times[PSI_MEM_FULL] += delta;
@@ -928,8 +946,8 @@ void psi_memstall_leave(unsigned long *flags)
 	 */
 	rq = this_rq_lock_irq(&rf);
 
-	current->in_memstall = 0;
 	psi_task_change(current, TSK_MEMSTALL, 0);
+	current->in_memstall = 0;
 
 	rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
 }
-- 
1.9.1