[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a987cad-6c46-280e-f791-6c59b6628a45@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:47:31 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
kim.phillips@....com, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ravi.bangoria@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf annotate: Add fusion logic for AMD microarchs
>> +static bool x86__ins_is_fused(struct arch *arch, const char *ins1,
>> + const char *ins2)
>> +{
>> + if (strstarts(arch->vendor, "AuthenticAMD"))
>> + return amd__ins_is_fused(arch, ins1, ins2);
>> +
>> + return intel__ins_is_fused(arch, ins1, ins2);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Can we instead make x86__ins_is_fused be a pointer and instead of
> storing arch->vendor we set it to one of amd__ins_is_fused() or
> intel__ins_is_fused()?
>
> I.e. here:
>
>> static int x86__cpuid_parse(struct arch *arch, char *cpuid)
>> {
>> unsigned int family, model, stepping;
>> @@ -184,6 +216,9 @@ static int x86__cpuid_parse(struct arch *arch, char *cpuid)
>> if (ret == 3) {
>> arch->family = family;
>> arch->model = model;
>> + arch->vendor = strndup(cpuid, 12);
>
> x86__ins_is_fused = strstarts(cpuid, "AuthenticAMD") ?
> amd__ins_is_fused :
> intel__ins_is_fused;
Sure. Will post v2.
Thanks for the review Arnaldo,
Ravi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists