[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210910122916.618186764@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:30:15 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Blank-Burian, Markus, Dr." <blankburian@...-muenster.de>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 11/26] blk-mq: fix kernel panic during iterating over flush request
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
commit c2da19ed50554ce52ecbad3655c98371fe58599f upstream.
For fixing use-after-free during iterating over requests, we grabbed
request's refcount before calling ->fn in commit 2e315dc07df0 ("blk-mq:
grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter").
Turns out this way may cause kernel panic when iterating over one flush
request:
1) old flush request's tag is just released, and this tag is reused by
one new request, but ->rqs[] isn't updated yet
2) the flush request can be re-used for submitting one new flush command,
so blk_rq_init() is called at the same time
3) meantime blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() is called, and old flush request
is retrieved from ->rqs[tag]; when blk_mq_put_rq_ref() is called,
flush_rq->end_io may not be updated yet, so NULL pointer dereference
is triggered in blk_mq_put_rq_ref().
Fix the issue by calling refcount_set(&flush_rq->ref, 1) after
flush_rq->end_io is set. So far the only other caller of blk_rq_init() is
scsi_ioctl_reset() in which the request doesn't enter block IO stack and
the request reference count isn't used, so the change is safe.
Fixes: 2e315dc07df0 ("blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter")
Reported-by: "Blank-Burian, Markus, Dr." <blankburian@...-muenster.de>
Tested-by: "Blank-Burian, Markus, Dr." <blankburian@...-muenster.de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210811142624.618598-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
block/blk-core.c | 1 -
block/blk-flush.c | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -121,7 +121,6 @@ void blk_rq_init(struct request_queue *q
rq->internal_tag = BLK_MQ_NO_TAG;
rq->start_time_ns = ktime_get_ns();
rq->part = NULL;
- refcount_set(&rq->ref, 1);
blk_crypto_rq_set_defaults(rq);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_rq_init);
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -330,6 +330,14 @@ static void blk_kick_flush(struct reques
flush_rq->rq_flags |= RQF_FLUSH_SEQ;
flush_rq->rq_disk = first_rq->rq_disk;
flush_rq->end_io = flush_end_io;
+ /*
+ * Order WRITE ->end_io and WRITE rq->ref, and its pair is the one
+ * implied in refcount_inc_not_zero() called from
+ * blk_mq_find_and_get_req(), which orders WRITE/READ flush_rq->ref
+ * and READ flush_rq->end_io
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+ refcount_set(&flush_rq->ref, 1);
blk_flush_queue_rq(flush_rq, false);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists