[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210910160409.GI4323@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 18:04:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] perf/x86: Add new event for AUX output counter
index
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 01:45:22PM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:
> On 9/7/2021 12:39 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > @@ -4494,8 +4500,16 @@ static int intel_pmu_check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
> > return intel_pmu_has_bts_period(event, value) ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > }
> > +static void intel_aux_output_init(void)
> > +{
> > + /* Refer also intel_pmu_aux_output_match() */
> > + if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
> > + x86_pmu.assign = intel_pmu_assign_event;
> > +}
>
> For a hybrid machine, x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available is always
> cleared. We probably need the PMU specific
> pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available here.
>
> > +
> > static int intel_pmu_aux_output_match(struct perf_event *event)
> > {
> > + /* intel_pmu_assign_event() is needed, refer intel_aux_output_init() */
> > if (!x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
> > return 0;
> >
>
> For a hybrid machine, this always return 0. I think we need to fix it first?
AFAICT the patch is correct for !hybrid, and the hybrid PT muck can then
also fix this up, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists