[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <296aa357-1bba-4136-c651-a18d04c8d32a@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:24:09 +0200
From: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: Larry.Finger@...inger.net, phil@...lpotter.co.uk, martin@...ser.cx,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] remove pointers from struct hal_ops
On 9/11/21 11:38, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On Friday, September 10, 2021 10:50:26 PM CEST Michael Straube wrote:
>> This series removes some more pointers from struct hal_ops and
>> removes the function rtl8188e_set_hal_ops() that is empty after
>> the removals.
>>
>> Michael Straube (7):
>> staging: r8188eu: remove mgnt_xmit from struct hal_ops
>> staging: r8188eu: remove hal_xmit from struct hal_ops
>> staging: r8188eu: remove read_bbreg from struct hal_ops
>> staging: r8188eu: remove write_bbreg from struct hal_ops
>> staging: r8188eu: remove read_rfreg from struct hal_ops
>> staging: r8188eu: remove write_rfreg from struct hal_ops
>> staging: r8188eu: remove rtl8188e_set_hal_ops()
>>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> This series is good.
>
> Furthermore, I compiled the whole series with gcc version 11.2.1 2020816
> [revision 056e324ce46a7924b5cf10f61010cf9dd2ca10e9] (SUSE Linux) one
> patch at a time. There are no errors or warnings at any time in any of the
> seven builds.
>
> But, unfortunately, I have no time to test. So the whole series is...
>
> Acked-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Fabio
>
Hi Fabio,
thank you for the review. I have tested it on x86_64 with
Inter-Tech DMG-02 connected to a CCMP network without any
issues.
Perhaps I should have mentioned that in the cover letter. ;)
Thanks,
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists