linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: tcp_drop adds `reason` and SNMP parameters for tracing v4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 11 Sep 2021 03:50:57 -0700
From:   Zhongya Yan <yan2228598786@...il.com>
To:     edumazet@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, brendan.d.gregg@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kuba@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, hengqi.chen@...il.com,
        yhs@...com, 2228598786@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tcp_drop adds `reason` and SNMP parameters for
 tracing v4

On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 03:50:12 -0700
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> Just curious. Is "Tcp" the normal way to write "TCP" in the kernel? I see
> it in snmp_seq_show_tcp_udp() in net/ipv4/proc.c, but no where else
> (besides doing CamelCase words). Should these be written using "TCP"
> instead of "Tcp". It just looks awkward to me.
>
> But hey, I'm not one of the networking folks, so what do I know?
>
> -- Steve

I will do it. I guess any other suggestions? I feel like my description may not be accurate.
Thanks.
    --Zhongya Yan