linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/msm/dpu: Fix timeout issues on command mode panels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 11 Sep 2021 18:35:21 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
To:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
Cc:     robdclark@...il.com, sean@...rly.run, airlied@...ux.ie,
        daniel@...ll.ch, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
        abhinavk@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
        martin.botka@...ainline.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, paul.bouchara@...ainline.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/msm/dpu: Fix timeout issues on command mode
 panels

Il 10/09/21 23:48, Marijn Suijten ha scritto:
> Hi Angelo!
> 
> On 2021-09-01 19:43:47, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> In function dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_wait_for_commit_done we are always
>> checking if the relative CTL is started by waiting for an interrupt
>> to fire: it is fine to do that, but then sometimes we call this
>> function while the CTL is up and has never been put down, but that
>> interrupt gets raised only when the CTL gets a state change from
>> 0 to 1 (disabled to enabled), so we're going to wait for something
>> that will never happen on its own.
>>
>> Solving this while avoiding to restart the CTL is actually possible
>> and can be done by just checking if it is already up and running
>> when the wait_for_commit_done function is called: in this case, so,
>> if the CTL was already running, we can say that the commit is done
>> if the command transmission is complete (in other terms, if the
>> interface has been flushed).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
>> index aa01698d6b25..b5b1b555ac4e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
>> @@ -682,6 +682,9 @@ static int dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_wait_for_commit_done(
>>   	if (!dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_is_master(phys_enc))
>>   		return 0;
>>   
>> +	if (phys_enc->hw_ctl->ops.is_started)
>> +		return dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_wait_for_tx_complete(phys_enc);
> 
> In the previous commit you introduced is_started to the ops struct as
> function pointer, and you probably intend to call it here instead of
> just checking whether it might be NULL.
> 
> As far as I remember this was also the reason for previously mentioning
> that it was faulty and required a v2 in:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/bdc67afc-3736-5497-c43f-5165c55e0354@somainline.org/
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> - Marijn
> 

Ugh. I've pulled this from the wrong tree.
Sending a v2 asap.

>> +
>>   	return _dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_wait_for_ctl_start(phys_enc);
>>   }
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.32.0
>>