[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <M64AZQ.XHLJ2TTJASSV1@ixit.cz>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 18:51:58 +0200
From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] [v2] dt-bindings: arm/msm/qcom,idle-state convert to
YAML
Thank you for the input, for now I applied option 1 to my another
tegra-ehci binding (instead of having own file) and it lead to success,
so I'll choose option 1 for this case too.
Best regards
David Heidelberg
On Fri, Sep 10 2021 at 17:04:25 -0500, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 07:14:53PM +0200, David Heidelberg wrote:
>> Switched maintainer from Lina to Bjorn.
>>
>> Doesn't fix:
>> ```
>> idle-states: 'spc' does not match any of the regexes:
>> '^(cpu|cluster)-', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>> ```
>> from colliding arm/idle-states.yaml .
>
> Your options are:
>
> - Drop this and add your node names and compatible strings to
> idle-states.yaml. A variation of this is change the QCom node names
> in dts files to match. Those look like the only real differences.
>
> - Extract the common idle state node properties to a common schema to
> reference from both schemas.
>
> I'd lean towards option 1 unless there are other variations of
> idle-state nodes that also need option 2.
>
> Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists