lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 11 Sep 2021 14:13:18 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999@...il.com>,
        Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Dimitrios Skarlatos <dskarlat@...cmu.edu>,
        Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
        Hubertus Franke <frankeh@...ibm.com>,
        Jack Chen <jianyan2@...inois.edu>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Josep Torrellas <torrella@...inois.edu>,
        Tianyin Xu <tyxu@...inois.edu>,
        Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
        Valentin Rothberg <vrothber@...hat.com>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: change default to
 spec_store_bypass_disable=prctl spectre_v2_user=prctl

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 06:50:54PM -0500, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Switch the kernel default of SSBD and STIBP to the ones with
> CONFIG_SECCOMP=n (i.e. spec_store_bypass_disable=prctl
> spectre_v2_user=prctl) even if CONFIG_SECCOMP=y.

Hello x86 maintainers!

I'd really like to get this landed, so I'll take this via the
seccomp-tree unless someone else speaks up. This keeps falling off
the edge of my TODO list. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ