[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <825AB372-93CE-43C0-8947-EAB819547494@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 21:43:18 -0700
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: io-uring: KASAN failure, presumably REQ_F_REISSUE issue
> On Sep 11, 2021, at 7:34 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Jens (& Pavel),
>
> I hope you are having a nice weekend. I ran into a KASAN failure in io-uring
> which I think is not "my fault".
Small correction of myself (beside the subject):
>
> I believe the issue is related to the handling of REQ_F_REISSUE and
> specifically to commit 230d50d448acb ("io_uring: move reissue into regular IO
> path"). There seems to be a race between io_write()/io_read()
> and __io_complete_rw()/kiocb_done().
>
> __io_complete_rw() sets REQ_F_REIUSSE:
>
> if ((res == -EAGAIN || res == -EOPNOTSUPP) &&
> io_rw_should_reissue(req)) {
> req->flags |= REQ_F_REISSUE;
> return;
> }
The race only appears to be with __io_complete_rw(), not kiocb_done().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists