linux-kernel - Re: [patch V5 34/72] locking/rwlock: Provide RT variant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210913062828.fu7f5n6wc3nw4lyt@linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 08:28:28 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [patch V5 34/72] locking/rwlock: Provide RT variant

On 2021-09-11 10:59:11 [+0800], Xiaoming Ni wrote:
> rt_rwlock_is_conted() exported but not declared in the header file?
> Is this a special design or a mistake?

under discussion, see
   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210906143004.2259141-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de
   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210910163704.ykotcrvbt6yaqron@linutronix.de

> Thanks
> Xiaoming Ni

Sebastian