linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.14 148/334] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Improve probe errors with dev_err

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210913131118.363501165@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:13:22 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.14 148/334] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Improve probe errors with dev_err_probe()

From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

[ Upstream commit 4c1b3d94bf632c1420a5d4108199f55a5655831d ]

As I was testing to make sure that the DEFER path worked well with my
patch series, I got tired of seeing this scary message in my logs just
because the panel needed to defer:
  [drm:ti_sn_bridge_probe] *ERROR* could not find any panel node

Let's use dev_err_probe() which nicely quiets this error and also
simplifies the code a tiny bit. We'll also update other places in the
file which can use dev_err_probe().

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.10.I24bba069e63b1eea84443eef0c8535fd032a6311@changeid
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 31 +++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index aef850296756..4d1483cf7b58 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -1302,10 +1302,9 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(np, 1, 0, &pdata->panel, NULL);
-	if (ret) {
-		DRM_ERROR("could not find any panel node\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(&adev->dev, ret,
+				     "could not find any panel node\n");
 
 	ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(pdata, np);
 
@@ -1432,27 +1431,23 @@ static int ti_sn65dsi86_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 
 	pdata->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client,
 					     &ti_sn65dsi86_regmap_config);
-	if (IS_ERR(pdata->regmap)) {
-		DRM_ERROR("regmap i2c init failed\n");
-		return PTR_ERR(pdata->regmap);
-	}
+	if (IS_ERR(pdata->regmap))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pdata->regmap),
+				     "regmap i2c init failed\n");
 
 	pdata->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
-	if (IS_ERR(pdata->enable_gpio)) {
-		DRM_ERROR("failed to get enable gpio from DT\n");
-		ret = PTR_ERR(pdata->enable_gpio);
-		return ret;
-	}
+	if (IS_ERR(pdata->enable_gpio))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pdata->enable_gpio),
+				     "failed to get enable gpio from DT\n");
 
 	ret = ti_sn65dsi86_parse_regulators(pdata);
-	if (ret) {
-		DRM_ERROR("failed to parse regulators\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to parse regulators\n");
 
 	pdata->refclk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "refclk");
 	if (IS_ERR(pdata->refclk))
-		return PTR_ERR(pdata->refclk);
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pdata->refclk),
+				     "failed to get reference clock\n");
 
 	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
 	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ti_sn65dsi86_runtime_disable, dev);
-- 
2.30.2