linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.14 208/334] selftests/bpf: Fix test_core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210913131120.453477361@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:14:22 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.14 208/334] selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_autosize on big-endian machines

From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit d164dd9a5c08c16a883b3de97d13948c7be7fa4d ]

The "probed" part of test_core_autosize copies an integer using
bpf_core_read() into an integer of a potentially different size.
On big-endian machines a destination offset is required for this to
produce a sensible result.

Fixes: 888d83b961f6 ("selftests/bpf: Validate libbpf's auto-sizing of LD/ST/STX instructions")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210812224814.187460-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_autosize.c  | 20 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_autosize.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_autosize.c
index 44f5aa2e8956..9a7829c5e4a7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_autosize.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_autosize.c
@@ -125,6 +125,16 @@ int handle_downsize(void *ctx)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
+#define bpf_core_read_int bpf_core_read
+#else
+#define bpf_core_read_int(dst, sz, src) ({ \
+	/* Prevent "subtraction from stack pointer prohibited" */ \
+	volatile long __off = sizeof(*dst) - (sz); \
+	bpf_core_read((char *)(dst) + __off, sz, src); \
+})
+#endif
+
 SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
 int handle_probed(void *ctx)
 {
@@ -132,23 +142,23 @@ int handle_probed(void *ctx)
 	__u64 tmp;
 
 	tmp = 0;
-	bpf_core_read(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->ptr), &in->ptr);
+	bpf_core_read_int(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->ptr), &in->ptr);
 	ptr_probed = tmp;
 
 	tmp = 0;
-	bpf_core_read(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val1), &in->val1);
+	bpf_core_read_int(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val1), &in->val1);
 	val1_probed = tmp;
 
 	tmp = 0;
-	bpf_core_read(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val2), &in->val2);
+	bpf_core_read_int(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val2), &in->val2);
 	val2_probed = tmp;
 
 	tmp = 0;
-	bpf_core_read(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val3), &in->val3);
+	bpf_core_read_int(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val3), &in->val3);
 	val3_probed = tmp;
 
 	tmp = 0;
-	bpf_core_read(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val4), &in->val4);
+	bpf_core_read_int(&tmp, bpf_core_field_size(in->val4), &in->val4);
 	val4_probed = tmp;
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.30.2