[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fbdd02bc-01ab-c5b3-9355-3ebe04601b04@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:09:24 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
avri.altman@....com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
cang@...eaurora.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com, sc.suh@...sung.com,
hy50.seo@...sung.com, sh425.lee@...sung.com,
bhoon95.kim@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: ufs: introduce vendor isr
On 9/13/21 12:55 AM, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
> This patch is to activate some interrupt sources
> that aren't defined in UFSHCI specifications. Those
> purpose could be error handling, workaround or whatever.
>
> Kiwoong Kim (3):
> scsi: ufs: introduce vendor isr
> scsi: ufs: introduce force requeue
> scsi: ufs: ufs-exynos: implement exynos isr
>
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 22 ++++++++++--
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
The UFS protocol is standardized. Your employer has a representative in the
UFS standardization committee. Please work with that representative to
standardize this feature instead of adding non-standard extensions to the UFS
driver.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists