lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hn5EvwjPggCeUw+kjDNjdzx3eLP2PRBGKRAyo2eYECyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:14:38 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation

On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 9:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is the third version of my patches to simplify the _OSC
> > negotiation of PCIe features between Linux and the firmware.
> >
> > This version is a complete rewrite, so there is no changelog to the
> > previous version. Patches 1-3 are cleanups and small restructurings of
> > the code as a preparation for patch 4.
> >
> > The last patch gets rid of the dedicated _OSC query to check for _OSC
> > support and merges that functionality into acpi_pci_osc_control_set().
> >
> > This allows to simplify and/or remove other functions and consilidate
> > error handling in negotiate_os_control().
> >
> > I have tested the patches with and without 'pcie_ports=compat' and
> > found no regressions on my test machine.
>
> I have reviewed the patches, so if you want me to queue up this
> series, please let me know.

Should I assume that Bjorn will be taking it?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ