linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.14 133/252] spi: tegra20-slink: Improve runtime PM usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YT+HCdNjfQxQayYH@sashalap>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:14:49 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.14 133/252] spi: tegra20-slink: Improve runtime
 PM usage

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 02:04:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 03:45:45PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 09.09.2021 15:37, Mark Brown пишет:
>
>> > This feels new featureish to me - it'll give you runtime PM where
>> > previously there was none.
>
>> Apparently all patches which have a word 'fix' in commit message are
>> auto-selected. I agree that it's better not to port this patch.
>
>Yeah, it's a fairly common source of false positives :/

And some of that falls on me: if it's obvious that the "fix" isn't a
real fix, I won't take it. In cases like this it's not clear to me
whether it's purely a better behaviour, or whether the devices staying
on/off/etc causes an actual problem.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha