linux-kernel - RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: hv: Support for Hyper-V vPCI for ARM64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:16:42 +0000
From:   Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC:     Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Boqun Feng <Boqun.Feng@...rosoft.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: hv: Support for Hyper-V vPCI for
 ARM64

On Monday, September 13, 2021 12:03 PM,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:

> > This patch adds support for Hyper-V vPCI by adding a PCI MSI
> > IRQ domain specific to Hyper-V that is based on SPIs. The IRQ
> > domain parents itself to the arch GIC IRQ domain for basic
> > vector management.
> 
> Given that we literally spent *weeks* discussing this, I would have
> appreciated if you had Cc'd me directly instead as a basic courtesy
> rather than me spotting it on the list.
>
I agree and please accept my sincere apologies. It was not intentional (
I just grabbed the list from get_maintainers and didn't pay further
attention to it). I definitely appreciated all of your comments and feedback
on the other discussion.

Thanks for your feedback. I will respond back to you, but I did wanted to
get this one out.

- Sunil