[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <bfeb0b12-5b95-46c9-8ea3-6a4a5bf59076@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:01:25 -0700
From: "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...nel.org>
To: "Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Lai Jiangshan" <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Ben Widawsky" <ben.widawsky@...el.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Arvind Sankar" <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/24] x86/traps: Rewrite native_load_gs_index in C code
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021, at 3:50 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> There is no constrain/limition to force native_load_gs_index() to be in
> ASM code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +
> +/*
> + * Reload gs selector with exception handling
> + * selector: new selector
> + *
> + * Is noinstr as it shouldn't be instrumented.
> + */
> +noinstr void native_load_gs_index(unsigned int selector)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
This patch would be a bit less alarming if you moved the swapgs into asm. Also, this needs a comment explaining why skipping the swapgs back to kernel gs in the exception path is correct.
> + native_swapgs();
> + asm volatile(
> + ".global asm_load_gs_index_gs_change \n"
> + "asm_load_gs_index_gs_change: \n"
> + "1: movl %0, %%gs \n"
> + " swapgs \n"
> + "2: \n"
> + _ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(1b, 2b, ex_handler_clear_gs)
> + :: "r" (selector) : "memory");
> + alternative("", "mfence", X86_BUG_SWAPGS_FENCE);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists