[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <169a507329c2273f64c1c7ebab0a3530b19e971e.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 23:31:13 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Florian Eckert <fe@....tdt.de>, peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca,
Eckert.Florian@...glemail.com
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon: Fix init endian vendor
check
On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 14:05 +0200, Florian Eckert wrote:
> On my embedded system I use this tpm infineon chip via i2c bus.
> The system is a MIPS architecture and therefore works in big endian mode.
>
> The problem is, that the chip type is not correctly recognized,
> because the vendor ID is wrongly aligned in the memory.
>
> By declaring the vendor ID variable as a `__le32` type, the TPM chip is
> then correctly recognized by the driver and feels then responsible.
Please no hyphens just normal single quotes.
You should have always in a commit message some explanation what
the patch does in imperative form, e.g. "Change type of xxx ...
because ...".
I cannot from find a variable named "vendor ID" from
tpm_tis_i2c_init(). Maybe you are referring to the variable,
of which name is "vendor"?
Finally, the commit message lacks explanation what is changed, i.e.
tpm2_tis_i2c_init() in this case.
Did you find the commit ID where this regression was introduceD?
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists