[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YT8IQioxUARMus9w@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:13:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: yzaikin@...gle.com, liu.hailong6@....com.cn, mingo@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, mcgrof@...nel.org,
keescook@...omium.org, pjt@...gle.com, yang.yang29@....com.cn,
joshdon@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cm>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Add a new version sysctl to control child runs
first
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 04:12:23AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
>
> The old version sysctl has some problems. First, it allows set value
> bigger than 1, which is unnecessary. Second, it didn't follow the
> rule of capabilities. Thirdly, it didn't use static key. This new
> version fixes all the problems.
Does any of that actually matter?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists