linux-kernel - RE: [RESEND PATCH] time: changed timespec64_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sfy8g9zu.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:23:01 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     OPENSOURCE Lukas Hannen 
        <lukas.hannen@...nsource.tttech-industrial.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        "EMC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RESEND PATCH] time: changed timespec64_to_ns to avoid underrun

Lukas,

On Mon, Sep 13 2021 at 06:49, OPENSOURCE Lukas Hannen wrote:
> (also ad 2,3 and 4: ) unfortunately our company mail system never showed me
> your replies to my original mail.

...

> You were right in assuming that the format of the patch was messed up by
> our company mail, I am as infuriated about that as you are and will try to
> change this situation asap.
>
> The other mishaps (like the wrong use of the RESEND tag, failing to check
> if the changes were already applied to your tree etc. ) were caused by me
> being a young and inexperienced contributor.

No problem. I was certainly not expecting that the resend was caused by
the lack of incoming mail on your side.

> Thank _You_ for not immediately ignoring me forever,

There's no reason to do so.

Thanks,

        tglx