| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 16:43:00 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Philip Chen <philipchen@...omium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: Add support for AUX channel
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 2:33 PM Philip Chen <philipchen@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Implement the first version of AUX support, which will be useful as
> we expand the driver to support varied use cases.
>
> WARNING: This patch is not fully verified by hardware. But as AUX CH
> is not implemented for ps8640 driver until now, the patch shouldn't
> cause any functional regression in practice.
Thanks for the heads up. NOTE: having this patch posted to do early
code review is fine, but fair warning that I don't think there'd be
much benefit in landing until the patch is verified more.
> Signed-off-by: Philip Chen <philipchen@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Handle the case where an AUX transaction has no payload
> - Add a reg polling for p0.0x83 to confirm AUX cmd is issued and
> read data is returned
> - Replace regmap_noinc_read/write with looped regmap_read/write,
> as regmap_noinc_read/write doesn't read one byte at a time unless
> max_raw_read/write is set to 1.
What about if you set val_bytes? I think you just need to set that to
"1" and it'll work?
> - Register/Unregister the AUX device explicitly when the bridge is
> attached/detached
> - Remove the use of runtime PM
I suspect runtime PM will need to be added back in at some point since
AUX channel needs to be functional even if the bridge hasn't been
"pre_enable"ed.
> - Program AUX addr/cmd/len in a single regmap_bulk_write()
> - Add newlines for DRM_ERROR mesages
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 153 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> index 1b2414601538..3b28e992bb3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> @@ -13,11 +13,32 @@
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>
> #include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_dp_helper.h>
> #include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
> #include <drm/drm_of.h>
> #include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
>
> +#define PAGE0_AUXCH_CFG3 0x76
> +#define AUXCH_CFG3_RESET 0xff
> +#define PAGE0_AUX_ADDR_7_0 0x7d
> +#define PAGE0_AUX_ADDR_15_8 0x7e
> +#define PAGE0_AUX_ADDR_23_16 0x7f
nit: my manual calls the above "SWAUX_ADDR". Can you add the "SW"? I
know it doesn't look pretty, but matching the manual is really nice.
Similar with other commands below.
> +#define AUX_ADDR_19_16_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
> +#define AUX_CMD_MASK GENMASK(7, 4)
> +#define PAGE0_AUX_LENGTH 0x80
> +#define AUX_LENGTH_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
> +#define AUX_NO_PAYLOAD BIT(7)
> +#define PAGE0_AUX_WDATA 0x81
> +#define PAGE0_AUX_RDATA 0x82
> +#define PAGE0_AUX_CTRL 0x83
> +#define AUX_SEND BIT(0)
> +#define PAGE0_AUX_STATUS 0x84
> +#define AUX_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(7, 5)
> +#define AUX_STATUS_TIMEOUT (0x7 << 5)
> +#define AUX_STATUS_DEFER (0x2 << 5)
> +#define AUX_STATUS_NACK (0x1 << 5)
> +
> #define PAGE2_GPIO_H 0xa7
> #define PS_GPIO9 BIT(1)
> #define PAGE2_I2C_BYPASS 0xea
> @@ -68,6 +89,7 @@ enum ps8640_vdo_control {
> struct ps8640 {
> struct drm_bridge bridge;
> struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge;
> + struct drm_dp_aux aux;
> struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
> struct i2c_client *page[MAX_DEVS];
> struct regmap *regmap[MAX_DEVS];
> @@ -117,6 +139,114 @@ static inline struct ps8640 *bridge_to_ps8640(struct drm_bridge *e)
> return container_of(e, struct ps8640, bridge);
> }
>
> +static inline struct ps8640 *aux_to_ps8640(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> +{
> + return container_of(aux, struct ps8640, aux);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t ps8640_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> + struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct ps8640 *ps_bridge = aux_to_ps8640(aux);
> + struct regmap *map = ps_bridge->regmap[PAGE0_DP_CNTL];
> + unsigned int len = msg->size;
> + unsigned int data;
> + int ret;
> + u8 request = msg->request &
> + ~(DP_AUX_I2C_MOT | DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE);
> + u8 *buf = msg->buffer;
> + u8 addr_len[PAGE0_AUX_LENGTH + 1 - PAGE0_AUX_ADDR_7_0];
> + u8 i;
> + bool is_native_aux = false;
> +
> + if (len > DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + switch (request) {
> + case DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE:
> + case DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ:
> + is_native_aux = true;
I think you need a "fallthrough;" here.
> + case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE:
> + case DP_AUX_I2C_READ:
> + ret = regmap_write(map, PAGE0_AUXCH_CFG3, AUXCH_CFG3_RESET);
Why not move the regmap_write() out of the switch statement? Also: you
store the "ret" but you never check it. You should handle the error.
> + break;
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + /* Assume it's good */
> + msg->reply = 0;
> +
> + addr_len[0] = msg->address & 0xff;
> + addr_len[1] = (msg->address >> 8) & 0xff;
> + addr_len[2] = ((request << 4) & AUX_CMD_MASK) |
Instead of "request", needs to be the version of "request" without
DP_AUX_I2C_MOT and DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE stripped out. In the
TI bridge chip it calls this "request_val".
> + ((msg->address >> 16) & AUX_ADDR_19_16_MASK);
> + addr_len[3] = (len == 0) ? AUX_NO_PAYLOAD :
> + ((len - 1) & AUX_LENGTH_MASK);
> +
> + regmap_bulk_write(map, PAGE0_AUX_ADDR_7_0, addr_len,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(addr_len));
> +
> + if (len && (request == DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE ||
> + request == DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE)) {
> + /* Write to the internal FIFO buffer */
> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> + ret = regmap_write(map, PAGE0_AUX_WDATA, buf[i]);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to write PAGE0_AUX_WDATA\n");
nit: can you use dev_err() so that the dev gets printed? Also, can you
print the error code?
> + goto exit;
Unless you re-add pm_runtime (which you'll have to eventually), the
above "goto exit" should just be "return ret". Same with other "goto
exit"s in your patch.
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + regmap_write(map, PAGE0_AUX_CTRL, AUX_SEND);
> +
> + /* Zero delay loop because i2c transactions are slow already */
> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(map, PAGE0_AUX_CTRL, data,
> + !(data & AUX_SEND), 0, 50 * 1000);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + regmap_read(map, PAGE0_AUX_STATUS, &data);
> + switch (data & AUX_STATUS_MASK) {
> + case AUX_STATUS_DEFER:
> + if (is_native_aux)
> + msg->reply |= DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER;
> + else
> + msg->reply |= DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_DEFER;
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + goto exit;
In the TI bridge chip driver we decided that we shouldn't handle the
defer case since the hardware was already handling it. Specifically in
the case of this bridge you can see that AUXCH_CFG1 shows a default
value of retrying 7 times. ...so presumably we shouldn't ever actually
get a defer here.
> + case AUX_STATUS_NACK:
> + if (is_native_aux)
> + msg->reply |= DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_NACK;
> + else
> + msg->reply |= DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_NACK;
> + ret = -EBUSY;
I believe that you shouldn't be setting "ret = -EBUSY" here. You're
supposed to be returning the number of bytes that were read / written
before the NAK happened. In the read case you should also be returning
the data that was actually read before the NAK too. Basically, add
something that reads "M" and stores it in "len"
> + goto exit;
> + case AUX_STATUS_TIMEOUT:
> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + goto exit;
You seem to be missing handlers for:
* ACKM
* Invalid reply
* I2C NACK
* I2C defer (probably don't need to deal with this?)
> + }
> +
> + if (len && (request == DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ ||
> + request == DP_AUX_I2C_READ)) {
> + /* Read from the internal FIFO buffer */
> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> + ret = regmap_read(map, PAGE0_AUX_WDATA, &data);
Oops, the above should be RDATA, not WDATA.
> + buf[i] = data;
> + if (ret < 0)
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to read PAGE0_AUX_RDATA\n");
Return the error? Print the error code?
> + }
> + }
> +
> +exit:
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return len;
> +}
> +
> static int ps8640_bridge_vdo_control(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge,
> const enum ps8640_vdo_control ctrl)
> {
> @@ -286,18 +416,32 @@ static int ps8640_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> dsi->format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888;
> dsi->lanes = NUM_MIPI_LANES;
> ret = mipi_dsi_attach(dsi);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err_dsi_attach;
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to attach dsi device: %d\n", ret);
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&ps_bridge->aux);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register DP AUX channel: %d\n", ret);
> + goto exit;
Don't you need to go to an "error" label that causes mipi_dsi_detach()
to get called?
> + }
>
> /* Attach the panel-bridge to the dsi bridge */
> return drm_bridge_attach(bridge->encoder, ps_bridge->panel_bridge,
> &ps_bridge->bridge, flags);
>
> -err_dsi_attach:
> +exit:
> mipi_dsi_device_unregister(dsi);
> return ret;
> }
>
> +
> +static void ps8640_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + drm_dp_aux_unregister(&bridge_to_ps8640(bridge)->aux);
I suspect that the lack of a "detach" was a prexisting bug. Perhaps
you can submit a patch before yours that fixes it? It should undo the
things that attach did, like calling mipi_dsi_detach() and
mipi_dsi_device_unregister()
> +}
> +
> static struct edid *ps8640_bridge_get_edid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> struct drm_connector *connector)
> {
> @@ -334,6 +478,7 @@ static struct edid *ps8640_bridge_get_edid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>
> static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ps8640_bridge_funcs = {
> .attach = ps8640_bridge_attach,
> + .detach = ps8640_bridge_detach,
> .get_edid = ps8640_bridge_get_edid,
> .post_disable = ps8640_post_disable,
> .pre_enable = ps8640_pre_enable,
> @@ -412,6 +557,11 @@ static int ps8640_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, ps_bridge);
>
> + ps_bridge->aux.name = "parade-ps8640-aux";
> + ps_bridge->aux.dev = dev;
> + ps_bridge->aux.transfer = ps8640_aux_transfer;
> + drm_dp_aux_init(&ps_bridge->aux);
> +
Eventually you're going to want these here:
devm_of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices(&ps_bridge->aux);
wait_for_device_probe()
...which I believe will enable DP AUX bus support. The second of those
two is just me being paranoid to handle the case where the AUX
endpoint device has an async probe.
In order to make the above work you'll need proper pm_runtime support
though since the aux channel needs to be usable before pre_enable().
That means you'll have to power the bridge on in the pm_runtime code
(enough to talk over the aux channel) and you'll need to use
"autosuspend" so that the bridge doesn't constantly power down between
aux transactions.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists