[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9942f964-442e-e782-3926-6d7d1123418a@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:49:43 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, bartosz.dudziak@...jp.pl,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>,
Max Merchel <Max.Merchel@...group.com>,
Hao Fang <fanghao11@...wei.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add LG Electronics
On 12/09/2021 01:27, Luca Weiss wrote:
> LG Electronics is a part of the LG Corporation and produces, amongst
> other things, consumer electronics such as phones and smartwatches.
Hi,
Thanks for the patches.
I think "lge" it's the same prefix as "lg". There is no sense in having
multiple vendor prefixes just because company splits inside business
units or subsidiaries. The same as with other conglomerates, e.g.
Samsung - if we wanted to be specific, there will be 4-5 Samsung
vendors... Not mentioning that company organisation is not always
disclosed and can change.
We already have lg for several components, also made by LG Electronics.
What about these?
There is only one device with "lge", added back in 2016 without adding
vendor prefix. I would propose to fix that one, instead of keeping
duplicated "lg".
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists