lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:05:05 +0800
From:   Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@....com>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [peterz-queue:sched/core 8/11]
 include/linux/sched.h:1722:57: warning: unused parameter 'dst'



On 9/11/21 8:24 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 05:16:05PM +0800, Chen, Rong A wrote:
>>
>> On 8/23/2021 5:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 09:20:50AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git sched/core
>>>> head:   234b8ab6476c5edd5262e2ff563de9498d60044a
>>>> commit: b90ca8badbd11488e5f762346b028666808164e7 [8/11] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity
>>>> config: i386-randconfig-a016-20210820 (attached as .config)
>>>> compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d9c5613e856cf2addfbf892fc4c1ce9ef9feceaa)
>>>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>>> Dear 0day folks; could you please blacklist me for all W=1 build output?
>>> I'm 100% not interested in random compiler generated garbage.
>> Hi Peterz,
>>
>> Got it, we'll do that for you asap.
> Rong, I seem to still be getting W=1 build warnings spam. Could you
> pleaes have a look?

Hi Peterz,

Sorry about that, do you mean we shouldn't test with W=1 for your repo?

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ