linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] spi: amd: Refactor code to use less spi_master_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <163153017122.45927.15918447354098819726.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:53:06 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Nehal Bakulchandra Shah <Nehal-Bakulchandra.shah@....com>,
        Lucas Tanure <tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Sanjay R Mehta <sanju.mehta@....com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] spi: amd: Refactor code to use less spi_master_get_devdata

On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 12:10:02 +0100, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> Get master data in the start and then just use struct amd_spi
> as it has the needed variable
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/4] spi: amd: Refactor code to use less spi_master_get_devdata
      commit: ca8e8a18272e7b57b62db5db8fcf1f5218b89a98
[2/4] spi: amd: Refactor amd_spi_busy_wait
      commit: 356b02f9ec3a7304d6c54c4df20cd37b0a22021e
[3/4] spi: amd: Remove unneeded variable
      commit: 3b02d2890bc5eb974346cc287e1732f62a096598
[4/4] spi: amd: Check for idle bus before execute opcode
      (no commit info)

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark