linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 121/144] ipv6: make exception cache less predictible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210913131051.969454176@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:15:02 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Keyu Man <kman001@....edu>, Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 121/144] ipv6: make exception cache less predictible

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit a00df2caffed3883c341d5685f830434312e4a43 ]

Even after commit 4785305c05b2 ("ipv6: use siphash in rt6_exception_hash()"),
an attacker can still use brute force to learn some secrets from a victim
linux host.

One way to defeat these attacks is to make the max depth of the hash
table bucket a random value.

Before this patch, each bucket of the hash table used to store exceptions
could contain 6 items under attack.

After the patch, each bucket would contains a random number of items,
between 6 and 10. The attacker can no longer infer secrets.

This is slightly increasing memory size used by the hash table,
we do not expect this to be a problem.

Following patch is dealing with the same issue in IPv4.

Fixes: 35732d01fe31 ("ipv6: introduce a hash table to store dst cache")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: Keyu Man <kman001@....edu>
Cc: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/ipv6/route.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index d6fc22f7d7a6..575bd0f1b008 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -1667,6 +1667,7 @@ static int rt6_insert_exception(struct rt6_info *nrt,
 	struct in6_addr *src_key = NULL;
 	struct rt6_exception *rt6_ex;
 	struct fib6_nh *nh = res->nh;
+	int max_depth;
 	int err = 0;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&rt6_exception_lock);
@@ -1721,7 +1722,9 @@ static int rt6_insert_exception(struct rt6_info *nrt,
 	bucket->depth++;
 	net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_rt_cache++;
 
-	if (bucket->depth > FIB6_MAX_DEPTH)
+	/* Randomize max depth to avoid some side channels attacks. */
+	max_depth = FIB6_MAX_DEPTH + prandom_u32_max(FIB6_MAX_DEPTH);
+	while (bucket->depth > max_depth)
 		rt6_exception_remove_oldest(bucket);
 
 out:
-- 
2.30.2