linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 084/236] i40e: improve locking of mac_filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:13:09 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...nic.de>,
        Konrad Jankowski <konrad0.jankowski@...el.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 084/236] i40e: improve locking of mac_filter_hash

From: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...nic.de>

[ Upstream commit 8b4b06919fd66caf49fdf4fe59f9d6312cf7956d ]

i40e_config_vf_promiscuous_mode() calls
i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters() without acquiring the
mac_filter_hash_lock spinlock.

This is unsafe because mac_filter_hash may get altered in another thread
while i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters() traverses the hashes.

Simply adding the spinlock in i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters() is not
possible as it already gets called in i40e_get_vlan_list_sync() with the
spinlock held. Therefore adding a wrapper that acquires the spinlock and
call the correct function where appropriate.

Fixes: 37d318d7805f ("i40e: Remove scheduling while atomic possibility")
Fix-suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...nic.de>
Tested-by: Konrad Jankowski <konrad0.jankowski@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 .../ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c    | 23 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
index e4f13a49c3df..a02167cce81e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
@@ -1107,12 +1107,12 @@ static int i40e_quiesce_vf_pci(struct i40e_vf *vf)
 }
 
 /**
- * i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters
+ * __i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters
  * @vsi: pointer to the vsi
  *
  * called to get the number of VLANs offloaded on this VF
  **/
-static int i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
+static int __i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
 {
 	struct i40e_mac_filter *f;
 	u16 num_vlans = 0, bkt;
@@ -1125,6 +1125,23 @@ static int i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
 	return num_vlans;
 }
 
+/**
+ * i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters
+ * @vsi: pointer to the vsi
+ *
+ * wrapper for __i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters() with spinlock held
+ **/
+static int i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
+{
+	int num_vlans;
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&vsi->mac_filter_hash_lock);
+	num_vlans = __i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters(vsi);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&vsi->mac_filter_hash_lock);
+
+	return num_vlans;
+}
+
 /**
  * i40e_get_vlan_list_sync
  * @vsi: pointer to the VSI
@@ -1142,7 +1159,7 @@ static void i40e_get_vlan_list_sync(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, u16 *num_vlans,
 	int bkt;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&vsi->mac_filter_hash_lock);
-	*num_vlans = i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters(vsi);
+	*num_vlans = __i40e_getnum_vf_vsi_vlan_filters(vsi);
 	*vlan_list = kcalloc(*num_vlans, sizeof(**vlan_list), GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!(*vlan_list))
 		goto err;
-- 
2.30.2