linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 103/236] tcp: seq_file: Avoid skipping sk during tcp_seek_last

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210913131103.847706651@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:13:28 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 103/236] tcp: seq_file: Avoid skipping sk during tcp_seek_last_pos

From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>

[ Upstream commit 525e2f9fd0229eb10cb460a9e6d978257f24804e ]

st->bucket stores the current bucket number.
st->offset stores the offset within this bucket that is the sk to be
seq_show().  Thus, st->offset only makes sense within the same
st->bucket.

These two variables are an optimization for the common no-lseek case.
When resuming the seq_file iteration (i.e. seq_start()),
tcp_seek_last_pos() tries to continue from the st->offset
at bucket st->bucket.

However, it is possible that the bucket pointed by st->bucket
has changed and st->offset may end up skipping the whole st->bucket
without finding a sk.  In this case, tcp_seek_last_pos() currently
continues to satisfy the offset condition in the next (and incorrect)
bucket.  Instead, regardless of the offset value, the first sk of the
next bucket should be returned.  Thus, "bucket == st->bucket" check is
added to tcp_seek_last_pos().

The chance of hitting this is small and the issue is a decade old,
so targeting for the next tree.

Fixes: a8b690f98baf ("tcp: Fix slowness in read /proc/net/tcp")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210701200541.1033917-1-kafai@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 04e259a04443..71395e745bc5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -2417,6 +2417,7 @@ static void *tcp_get_idx(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t pos)
 static void *tcp_seek_last_pos(struct seq_file *seq)
 {
 	struct tcp_iter_state *st = seq->private;
+	int bucket = st->bucket;
 	int offset = st->offset;
 	int orig_num = st->num;
 	void *rc = NULL;
@@ -2427,7 +2428,7 @@ static void *tcp_seek_last_pos(struct seq_file *seq)
 			break;
 		st->state = TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING;
 		rc = listening_get_next(seq, NULL);
-		while (offset-- && rc)
+		while (offset-- && rc && bucket == st->bucket)
 			rc = listening_get_next(seq, rc);
 		if (rc)
 			break;
@@ -2438,7 +2439,7 @@ static void *tcp_seek_last_pos(struct seq_file *seq)
 		if (st->bucket > tcp_hashinfo.ehash_mask)
 			break;
 		rc = established_get_first(seq);
-		while (offset-- && rc)
+		while (offset-- && rc && bucket == st->bucket)
 			rc = established_get_next(seq, rc);
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.2