lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c04db79-7de1-93ff-0908-9bad60a287b9@suse.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:29:07 +0200
From:   Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
To:     Roman Skakun <rm.skakun@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrii Anisov <andrii_anisov@...m.com>,
        Roman Skakun <roman_skakun@...m.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: set IO TLB segment size via cmdline

On 14.09.2021 17:10, Roman Skakun wrote:
> From: Roman Skakun <roman_skakun@...m.com>
> 
> It is possible when default IO TLB size is not
> enough to fit a long buffers as described here [1].
> 
> This patch makes a way to set this parameter
> using cmdline instead of recompiling a kernel.
> 
> [1] https://www.xilinx.com/support/answers/72694.html

I'm not convinced the swiotlb use describe there falls under "intended
use" - mapping a 1280x720 framebuffer in a single chunk? (As an aside,
the bottom of this page is also confusing, as following "Then we can
confirm the modified swiotlb size in the boot log:" there is a log
fragment showing the same original size of 64Mb.

> --- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ void __init plat_swiotlb_setup(void)
>  		swiotlbsize = 64 * (1<<20);
>  #endif
>  	swiotlb_nslabs = swiotlbsize >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> -	swiotlb_nslabs = ALIGN(swiotlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> +	swiotlb_nslabs = ALIGN(swiotlb_nslabs, swiotlb_io_seg_size());

In order to be sure to catch all uses like this one (including ones
which make it upstream in parallel to yours), I think you will want
to rename the original IO_TLB_SEGSIZE to e.g. IO_TLB_DEFAULT_SEGSIZE.

> @@ -81,15 +86,30 @@ static unsigned int max_segment;
>  static unsigned long default_nslabs = IO_TLB_DEFAULT_SIZE >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>  
>  static int __init
> -setup_io_tlb_npages(char *str)
> +setup_io_tlb_params(char *str)
>  {
> +	unsigned long tmp;
> +
>  	if (isdigit(*str)) {
> -		/* avoid tail segment of size < IO_TLB_SEGSIZE */
> -		default_nslabs =
> -			ALIGN(simple_strtoul(str, &str, 0), IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> +		default_nslabs = simple_strtoul(str, &str, 0);
>  	}
>  	if (*str == ',')
>  		++str;
> +
> +	/* get max IO TLB segment size */
> +	if (isdigit(*str)) {
> +		tmp = simple_strtoul(str, &str, 0);
> +		if (tmp)
> +			io_tlb_seg_size = ALIGN(tmp, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);

>From all I can tell io_tlb_seg_size wants to be a power of 2. Merely
aligning to a multiple of IO_TLB_SEGSIZE isn't going to be enough.

Jan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ