[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210914145953.189f15dc@oasis.local.home>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:59:53 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: Fixes to bootconfig memory management
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:01:31 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> All of these are just plain wrong:
I'll revert these, and expect Masami to address the issues you present.
Note, they do fix a real bug as shown by:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/e5c7ce5b-93f0-b305-de32-c99d0390eb28@suse.cz/
>
> > +static void *init_xbc_data_copy __initdata;
> > +static phys_addr_t init_xbc_data_size __initdata;
> > + init_xbc_data_copy = copy;
> > + init_xbc_data_size = size + 1;
> > + memblock_free(__pa(init_xbc_data_copy), init_xbc_data_size);
>
> because the xbc code already saves these as xbc_data/xbc_data_size and
> that final free should just be done in xbc_destroy_all().
>
> So this fix is pointlessly ugly to begin with.
>
> But what I _really_ ended up reacting to was that
>
> > + memblock_free(__pa(copy), size + 1);
Should we hold off until mm has fixed this issue?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists