[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ee9qdft1.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:10:18 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@...il.com>
Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: checkpatch: Add SYMBOLIC_PERMS message
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 1:53 PM Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add a new message type SYMBOLIC_PERMS under the 'Permissions'
>> subsection. Octal permission bits are easier to read and understand
>> instead of their symbolic macro names.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@...il.com>
>> Acked-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
>> index f0956e9ea2d8..41037594ec24 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
>> @@ -957,6 +957,17 @@ Permissions
>> Permission bits should use 4 digit octal permissions (like 0700 or 0444).
>> Avoid using any other base like decimal.
>>
>> + **SYMBOLIC_PERMS**
>> + Permission bits in the octal form are more readable and easier to
>> + understand than their symbolic counterparts because many command-line
>> + tools use this notation only. Experienced kernel developers have been using
>
> Let's remove "only".
>
>> + this traditional Unix permission bits for decades and so they find it
>
> Maybe you meant "these" here.
>
> With these changes made,
> Acked-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
I took the liberty of apply the patch with those changes made.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists