linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] Linux 5.15-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <367cc748-d411-8cf8-ff95-07715c55e899@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:51:22 +0200
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Cc:     Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, todd.fujinaka@...el.com,
        Hisashi T Fujinaka <htodd@...fifty.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] Linux 5.15-rc1 - 82599ES VPD access isue

On 14.09.2021 01:32, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2021, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> 
>> On 13.09.2021 22:32, Dave Jones wrote:
>>
>> + Jesse and Tony as Intel NIC maintainers
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:22:57PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>
>>> >> This didn't help I'm afraid :(
>>> >> It changed the VPD warning, but that's about it...
>>> >>
>>> >> [  184.235496] pci 0000:02:00.0: calling  quirk_blacklist_vpd+0x0/0x22 @ 1
>>> >> [  184.235499] pci 0000:02:00.0: [Firmware Bug]: disabling VPD access (can't determine size of non-standard VPD format)
>>> >> [  184.235501] pci 0000:02:00.0: quirk_blacklist_vpd+0x0/0x22 took 0 usecs
>>> >>
>>> > With this patch there's no VPD access to this device any longer. So this can't be
>>> > the root cause. Do you have any other PCI device that has VPD capability?
>>> > -> Capabilities: [...] Vital Product Data
>>>
>>>
>>> 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
>>>         Subsystem: Device 1dcf:030a
>>>     ...
>>>             Capabilities: [e0] Vital Product Data
>>>                 Unknown small resource type 06, will not decode more.
>>>
>>
>> When searching I found the same symptom of invalid VPD data for 82599EB.
>> Do these adapters have non-VPD data in VPD address space? Or is the actual
>> VPD data at another offset than 0? I know that few Chelsio devices have
>> such a non-standard VPD structure.
>>
>>>
>>> I'll add that to the quirk list and see if that helps.
>>>
>>>     Dave
>>>
>> Heiner
> 
> Sorry to reply from my personal account. If I did it from my work
> account I'd be top-posting because of Outlook and that goes over like a
> lead balloon.
> 
> Anyway, can you send us a dump of your eeprom using ethtool -e? You can
> either send it via a bug on e1000.sourceforge.net or try sending it to
> todd.fujinaka@...el.com
> 
> The other thing is I'm wondering is what the subvendor device ID you
> have is referring to because it's not in the pci database. Some ODMs
> like getting creative with what they put in the NVM.
> 
> Todd Fujinaka (todd.fujinaka@...el.com)

Thanks for the prompt reply. Dave, could you please provide the requested
information?