[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210914070846.GA80235@chenyu-desktop>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:08:46 +0800
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Dou Shengnan <shengnanx.dou@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5][RFC] selftests/pfru: add test for Platform Firmware
Runtime Update and Telemetry
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 12:08:40PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:40:30PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> > Introduce a simple test for Platform Firmware Runtime Update and Telemetry
> > drivers. It is based on ioctl to either update firmware driver or code injection,
> > and read corresponding PFRU Telemetry log into user space.
> >
[snip..
> > +struct updated_result {
> > + enum dsm_status status;
> > + enum dsm_status ext_status;
> > + unsigned long low_auth_time;
> > + unsigned long high_auth_time;
> > + unsigned long low_exec_time;
> > + unsigned long high_exec_time;
> > +};
>
> Most of these types and constants seem to be a copy of uapu/linux/pfru.h.
> Shouldn't the test get them from there?
>
Yes they have shared structures. The next version will reuse the uapi header.
thanks,
Chenyu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists