lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:06:05 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, vbabka@...e.cz,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_isolation: fix potential missing call to
 unset_migratetype_isolate()

On Tue 14-09-21 11:09:47, Miaohe Lin wrote:
[...]
> So even the Fixes tag should be removed ?

I would keep that one there. Fixes tag is useful to frame the scope of
the fix. For example when somebody is backporting the commit mentioned
in the Fixes tag then a) a lot of follow up patches with Fixes can tell
you this won't be an easy ride and you might want to reconsider risks
vs. benefit b) it helps to collect follow up fixes more easily.

That is a different story from cc: stable which just collects patches
and push them to all consumers of the stable branch if they apply.

To conclude, the Fixes tag is a generaly useful tag to bind patches
together and let people evaluate how important that is while Cc stable
is an indication that a fix is serious enough to push to all stable
users.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ