linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/5] efi: Introduce EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <d2e2dcb260d0c45d9bd781e23f410ed2c9a71610.1631600169.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:30:36 +0800
From:   Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] efi: Introduce EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER and corresponding structures

Platform Firmware Runtime Update image starts with UEFI headers, and the
headers are defined in UEFI specification, but some of them have not been
defined in the kernel yet.

For example, the header layout of a capsule file looks like this:

EFI_CAPSULE_HEADER
EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER
EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADER
EFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_AUTHENTICATION

These structures would be used by the Platform Firmware Runtime Update
driver to parse the format of capsule file to verify if the corresponding
version number is valid. The EFI_CAPSULE_HEADER has been defined in the
kernel, however the rest are not, thus introduce corresponding UEFI
structures accordingly.

The reason why efi_manage_capsule_header_t and
efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t are packedi might be that:
According to the uefi spec,
[Figure 23-6 Firmware Management and Firmware Image Management headers]
EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER is located at the lowest offset
within the body of the capsule. And this structure is designed to be
unaligned to save space, because in this way the adjacent drivers and
binary payload elements could start on byte boundary with no padding.
And the EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADER is at the head of
each payload, so packing this structure also makes room for more data.

Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
---
 include/linux/efi.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
index 6b5d36babfcc..19ff834e1388 100644
--- a/include/linux/efi.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi.h
@@ -148,6 +148,56 @@ typedef struct {
 	u32 imagesize;
 } efi_capsule_header_t;

+#pragma pack(1)
+
+/* EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER */
+typedef struct {
+	u32	ver;
+	u16	emb_drv_cnt;
+	u16	payload_cnt;
+	/*
+	 * Variable array indicated by number of
+	 * (emb_drv_cnt + payload_cnt)
+	 */
+	u64	offset_list[];
+} efi_manage_capsule_header_t;
+
+/* EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADER */
+typedef struct {
+	u32	ver;
+	guid_t	image_type_id;
+	u8	image_index;
+	u8	reserved_bytes[3];
+	u32	image_size;
+	u32	vendor_code_size;
+	/* ver = 2. */
+	u64	hw_ins;
+	/* ver = v3. */
+	u64	capsule_support;
+} efi_manage_capsule_image_header_t;
+
+#pragma pack()
+
+/* WIN_CERTIFICATE */
+typedef struct {
+	u32	len;
+	u16	rev;
+	u16	cert_type;
+} win_cert_t;
+
+/* WIN_CERTIFICATE_UEFI_GUID */
+typedef struct {
+	win_cert_t	hdr;
+	guid_t		cert_type;
+	u8		cert_data[];
+} win_cert_uefi_guid_t;
+
+/* EFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_AUTHENTICATIO */
+typedef struct {
+	u64				mon_count;
+	win_cert_uefi_guid_t		auth_info;
+} efi_image_auth_t;
+
 /*
  * EFI capsule flags
  */
-- 
2.25.1