[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUBasMWLAjzcgtt9@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:17:52 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: detect allocation forbidden by cpuset
and bail out early
On Tue 14-09-21 10:01:26, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 9/14/21 05:40, Feng Tang wrote:
[...]
> > +/* Whether the 'nodes' are all movable nodes */
> > +static inline bool movable_only_nodes(nodemask_t *nodes)
> > +{
> > + struct zonelist *zonelist;
> > + struct zoneref *z;
> > +
> > + if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + zonelist =
> > + &NODE_DATA(first_node(*nodes))->node_zonelists[ZONELIST_FALLBACK];
> > + z = first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, ZONE_NORMAL, nodes);
> > + return (!z->zone) ? true : false;
> > +}
>
> Hmm, could all that become just this?
>
> !nodes_intersects(&node_states[N_NORMAL_MEMORY], nodes)
Maybe yes but I find the zonelist approach much easier to follow even
though the code looks more complex at first sight. It talks about an
empty zone list for ZONE_NORMAL request which is quite clear from the
scribble. I always have to re-learn how the N*MEMORY works TBH. Maybe
this is just me though.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists