linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v1] nvme-tcp: enable linger socket option on shutdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:46:13 +0200
From:   Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] nvme-tcp: enable linger socket option on shutdown

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 08:58:20AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 02:17:57PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > When the no linger is set, the networking stack sends FIN followed by
> > RST immediately when shutting down the socket. By enabling linger when
> > shutting down we have a proper shutdown sequence on the wire.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
> > ---
> > The current shutdown sequence on the wire is a bit harsh and
> > doesn't let the remote host to react. I suppose we should
> > introduce a short (how long?) linger pause when shutting down
> > the connection. Thoughs?
> 
> Why?  I'm not really a TCP expert, but why is this different from
> say iSCSI or NBD?

I am also no TCP expert. Adding netdev to Cc.

During testing the nvme-tcp subsystem by one of our partners we observed
this. Maybe this is perfectly fine. Just as I said it looks a bit weird
that a proper shutdown of the connection a RST is send out right after
the FIN.

No idea how iSCSI or NBD handles this. I'll check.