linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.14 03/25] cxl: Move cxl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210914095749.0000151f@Huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:57:49 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.14 03/25] cxl: Move cxl_core to new directory

On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:56:23 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:33:17 -0400
> Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> > 
> > [ Upstream commit 5161a55c069f53d88da49274cbef6e3c74eadea9 ]
> > 
> > CXL core is growing, and it's already arguably unmanageable. To support
> > future growth, move core functionality to a new directory and rename the
> > file to represent just bus support. Future work will remove non-bus
> > functionality.
> > 
> > Note that mem.h is renamed to cxlmem.h to avoid a namespace collision
> > with the global ARCH=um mem.h header.  
> 
> Not a fix...
> 
> I'm guessing this got picked up on the basis of the Reported-by: tag?
> I think that was added for a minor tweak as this went through review rather
> than referring to the whole patch.
Or possibly because it was a precursor to the fix in the next patch.

Hmm.  Ben, Dan, does it make sense for these two to go into stable?

Jonathan

> 
> Jonathan
> 
> 
> > 
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162792537866.368511.8915631504621088321.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/driver-api/cxl/memory-devices.rst | 2 +-
> >  drivers/cxl/Makefile                            | 4 +---
> >  drivers/cxl/core/Makefile                       | 5 +++++
> >  drivers/cxl/{core.c => core/bus.c}              | 4 ++--
> >  drivers/cxl/{mem.h => cxlmem.h}                 | 0
> >  drivers/cxl/pci.c                               | 2 +-
> >  drivers/cxl/pmem.c                              | 2 +-
> >  7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/cxl/core/Makefile
> >  rename drivers/cxl/{core.c => core/bus.c} (99%)
> >  rename drivers/cxl/{mem.h => cxlmem.h} (100%)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/cxl/memory-devices.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/cxl/memory-devices.rst
> > index 487ce4f41d77..a86e2c7c551a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/cxl/memory-devices.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/cxl/memory-devices.rst
> > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ CXL Core
> >  .. kernel-doc:: drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> >     :internal:
> >  
> > -.. kernel-doc:: drivers/cxl/core.c
> > +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/cxl/core/bus.c
> >     :doc: cxl core
> >  
> >  External Interfaces
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/Makefile b/drivers/cxl/Makefile
> > index 32954059b37b..d1aaabc940f3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/Makefile
> > @@ -1,11 +1,9 @@
> >  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_BUS) += cxl_core.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_BUS) += core/
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_MEM) += cxl_pci.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_ACPI) += cxl_acpi.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_PMEM) += cxl_pmem.o
> >  
> > -ccflags-y += -DDEFAULT_SYMBOL_NAMESPACE=CXL
> > -cxl_core-y := core.o
> >  cxl_pci-y := pci.o
> >  cxl_acpi-y := acpi.o
> >  cxl_pmem-y := pmem.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/Makefile b/drivers/cxl/core/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..ad137f96e5c8
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_BUS) += cxl_core.o
> > +
> > +ccflags-y += -DDEFAULT_SYMBOL_NAMESPACE=CXL -I$(srctree)/drivers/cxl
> > +cxl_core-y := bus.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core.c b/drivers/cxl/core/bus.c
> > similarity index 99%
> > rename from drivers/cxl/core.c
> > rename to drivers/cxl/core/bus.c
> > index a2e4d54fc7bc..0815eec23944 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/bus.c
> > @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
> >  #include <linux/pci.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include <linux/idr.h>
> > -#include "cxl.h"
> > -#include "mem.h"
> > +#include <cxlmem.h>
> > +#include <cxl.h>
> >  
> >  /**
> >   * DOC: cxl core
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> > similarity index 100%
> > rename from drivers/cxl/mem.h
> > rename to drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > index 4cf351a3cf99..a945c5fda292 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > @@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
> >  #include <linux/pci.h>
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> >  #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
> > +#include "cxlmem.h"
> >  #include "pci.h"
> >  #include "cxl.h"
> > -#include "mem.h"
> >  
> >  /**
> >   * DOC: cxl pci
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pmem.c b/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
> > index 0088e41dd2f3..9652c3ee41e7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
> > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/ndctl.h>
> >  #include <linux/async.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > -#include "mem.h"
> > +#include "cxlmem.h"
> >  #include "cxl.h"
> >  
> >  /*  
>